You do not have a data problem.
You have a decision discipline problem.
Clarity before capital.
Most capital risk begins as drift, not drama.
Most firms analyse. Few interrogate structure.
This is a live decision session, not a download.
Five minutes of input. A committee-ready memorandum on screen.
What you get
- This is a live decision discipline, not a download.
- A structured Premise Decision Memorandum
- Explicit assumptions
- The main risk isolated
- One defensible move
- One defined first step this week
Private by default. Use placeholders. No names required. You work inside your own ChatGPT account. We cannot see your chats.
Serious operators do not debate decisions.
They discipline them.
Traditional review produces volume.
Premise produces decision artefacts.
Why this exists
Most capital risk begins as drift.
- One assumption stays unspoken.
- A decision gets made under pressure.
- The committee reopens it later.
- Time slips.
- Accountability blurs.
The risk is not effort.
The risk is unclear logic.
Two ways to verify the method
Run your own decision
Or read the proof under pressure
This is a repeatable governance discipline.
Before you see what we claim
Examine how the method behaves under pressure.
Proof is layered. Method first. Application second.
Proof panels
- These are not testimonials. They are structural receipts.
- Three different decisions. One identical decision structure.
- This is what disciplined governance looks like when pressure hits.
Anonymised and used with permission. Details are masked.
1
Portfolio triage across holdings
Decision type Hold, intervene, or exit across holdings without drifting into debate.
Output: Core constraint Clarity is the constraint, not activity.
First move: Name the single decision and the one gating assumption.
2
Capital allocation and timing
Decision type Deploy now, hold, or reallocate under uncertainty.
Output: Core constraint Assumption clarity is the constraint, not data volume.
First move: Declare the timing rule and the one condition that changes it.
3
Operating intervention in a portfolio company
Decision type Intervene now or let the plan run, and what to change first.
Output: Core constraint The constraint is the operating bottleneck, not effort.
First move: Define the single intervention and the one gate condition.
When structural drift goes unnoticed, capital compounds the error.
If you want to see the method under scrutiny, start here.
Public stress test
This is a dated proof trail that shows the method under public pressure.
If Premise can produce this level of proof clarity using public artefacts, imagine what it can surface inside your private environment where the real signals live.
If this is how the method performs with public artefacts, consider its role inside mandate-bound capital.
Built for governance, not noise
Private by default
Use placeholders. No names. No identifying details.
Explicit assumptions
Every memorandum forces assumptions into plain language before action.
One move, not ten
We narrow to one defensible move, not a list of ideas.
Clear first step
Every memorandum ends with one defined action to take this week.
Structured method
This is a repeatable decision structure that produces a committee ready artefact.
Two ways to verify the method
Run your own decision
Or read the proof under pressure